Text-overlap comparison
4 candidate passages (embedding cosine similarity 0.86–1.00) identified this pair for review. Below, both papers are rendered end to end as a single word-level diff: text the two share verbatim is highlighted, and everything that differs is marked where it falls. This is the view for a pair that is substantially one document rather than a handful of reused passages — what it shows is how little differs, and where.
PAPER A
PAPER B
Red and green mark two different things, both real: text present in only one paper, and single words substituted or inserted/deleted inside an otherwise-shared run. The run counts above separate them. Note also what the percentage counts: every word falling inside a matched run, including those edited words. Of the 2,465 words it counts as shared on the paper a side, 91 (4%) are substituted or inserted/deleted rather than identical — so read the figure as "this much of the document is the same passage", not "this much is word-for-word".
This view reads both papers in order, so matched text that sits at a different POSITION in each one cannot be placed: 128 words of paper a and 83 of paper b are matched by the scan but render below as unique to one side. The overlap figure is therefore the scan's — 96% of paper a and 97% of paper b — not the 91%/93% this diff shows in place. The per-run exhibit view (drop --whole-document) shows every run regardless of order.
e-ISSN: 0975-1556, p-ISSN:2820-2643 Available online on www.ijpcr.com International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2024; 16(5); 16(3); 1793-1796 792-795 Singh Chaudhary et al. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 1793 792 Original Research Article A Study of Factors Affecting Low Birth Weight in a Tertiary Care Centre Bhaskar Prasad Singh1, Md. Kamran Fazal2, Md. Sariful Haque3, Amrendra Narayan Chaudhary4 1Tutor, Department of Community Medicine, JLNMC, Bhagalpur 2Assistant Vijay Kumar Chaudhary1, Hem Kant Jha2, Hemant Kumar3, Chandramani4, Prabhat Kumar Lal5 1Assistant JLNMC, Bhagalpur 3Tutor, DMCH, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga 2Professor & Head, JLNMC, Bhagalpur 4Associate DMCH, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga 3Assistant JLNMC, Bhagalpur DMCH, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga 4Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, DMCH, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga 5Professor, Department of Community Medicine, DMCH, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga 14-02-2024 17-01-2024 / Revised: 27-03-2024 23-02-2024 / Accepted: 16-04-2024 16-03-2024 Corresponding Author: Dr. Bhaskar Prasad Singh Hemant Kumar Conflict of interest: Nil Abstract: Background: The World Health Organization defines “the term Low birth weight as birth weight less than 2500 grams irrespective of the duration of the gestational period.” Low-birth-weight (LBW) is “universal accepted indicator of health status. It is a subject of national concern and a focus of health policy. LBW has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of childhood mortality and morbidity. Methods: Total of 300 LBW babies (cases) and 600 NBW babies (controls) among all deliveries within the study period at 17 april 2018 to 16 july 2020 were considered. duration of Two years. The sample size for the present study was 900, considering 1:2 ratio of cases: controls. Data collected were entered using Epidata 3.1 and coding was done. Results: Factors illiteracy and primary secondary education of mother, maternal occupation like coolie and agricultural workers, class III and IV socioeconomic status, maternal height < 145cms, maternal postpartum body weight <40 kgs, severe anaemic status, moderate activities of mother, time of registration above 20 weeks of gestational age and interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months were found to be significantly associated with low birth weight. Conclusion: To conclude, present study showed higher rate of low birth weight found among mothers who were illiterates, and who had no primary and secondary education. Keywords: Low birth weight, Maternal factors, Mortality. This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided original work is properly credited.
Introduction The World Health Organization has defined the term “Low birth weight” as birthweight birth weight less than 2500 grams irrespective of the duration of the gestational period.[1] period. [1] Globally, more than 20 million infants are born with low birth weight.[2] weight. [2] The prevalence of LBW infants in India is about 28%, as compared to 4% in industrially developed countries.[3] countries. [3] According to epidemiological observational studies infants weighing lesser than 2500 g are approximately 20 times more likely to die than heavier babies and are closely associated with the foetal and neonatal mortality and morbidity.[4] morbidity. [4] Low birth weight leads to impaired growth of the newborn with its attendant risks of a higher mortality rate, increased morbidity, impaired mental development, and a higher risk of chronic adult disease.[5] disease. [5] Weight at birth is directly influenced by general health status of the mother. Early induction of labour or caesarean section birth, infections, other chronic conditions, multiple pregnancies, pregnancy induced hypertension contribute to low-birth-weight low birth weight outcome. Fetal and neonatal mortality Poor development with respect to cognition and higher chronic disease risk in late period of life are the major consequences of low birth weight in India. [6,7] The most important measure of lowbirth-weight low birth weight estimates or predicts the mortality and morbidity which directly or indirectly reflects the nutritional rate or status and growth rates. [6] According to World health organization about 25 million low birth weight babies are born each year, nearly 95% of them in developing countries [2]. South East Asia has the highest prevalence of low birth weight babies. “The global reduction in mortality of children aged <5 years between 1990 and 2015 was 53% against the aim of a two- thirds reduction by Millennium Development Goals. For under five mortality estimation reports “an almost constant annual rate of reduction in south-east Asia during this period.[8] period. [7] Nevertheless, low birth weight is a global concern, as some high-income countries are also faced with high rates for their contexts The low birth weight prevalence is about 28%, as compared to 4% in industrially developed countries.[3] countries. [3] The proportional contribution of infant deaths to overall child mortality has increased over the years and has reached 73%, so it is important to target this period of life. The goal was “to reduce the infant mortality. [9]
International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research e-ISSN: 0975-1556, p-ISSN: 2820-2643 Singh et al. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 1794 mortality rate (IMR) from 72/1000 live births in 1998 to 57/1000 live births in 2006 according to the Sample Registration System (SRS) of India reported a decline in, which further declined to 39/1000 live births in 2014. Moreover, in rural India where the majority of births take place, the IMR is significantly higher than in urban areas. In the developing countries Infant mortality rate is very high compared to developed countries. Of the various International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research e-ISSN: 0975-1556, p-ISSN: 2820-2643 Chaudhary et al. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 793 causes of Infant mortality, either in developing or developed countries, birth weight is one of the important factors for the survival, normal growth and development of a child. The low birth weight is considered as sensitive index of nation’s health and development. [8] Low birth weight leads to impaired growth of the newborn with its attendant risks of a higher mortality rate, increased morbidity, impaired mental development, and a higher risk of chronic adult disease. [5] Weight at birth is directly influenced by general health status of the mother. This study estimates the proportion of babies with low birth weight and to identify the maternal risk factors associated with these low birth weight deliveries. [10]
Objectives: [9] Objectives To study factors affecting Low Birth Weight in a tertiary care centre. centre Material and Methods The present study was a hospital-based hospital based case-control study, The study was done for a between from April 2018 to July 2020, done, Study duration of Two years. Jawahar lal Nehru Darbhanga Bhagalpur, and Hospital Laheriasarai, Darbhanga, Bihar. ascertain the feasibility of the study as well as to ensure that the questionnaire collects sufficient data so as to meet the study objectives. The sequential order of few questions in the questionnaire was modified for better collection of data. Thus the data collecting tools were standardized and validated during the pilot study so as to ensure better data collection. Study subjects included mothers delivering Low Birth Weight (LBW) babies at term and mothers delivering Normal Birth Weight (NBW) babies at tem in the study setting. As per the data collected from the hospital records, the average number of low birth deliveries occurred during the past 2 years (who satisfy the present study criteria) accounted to 320. Total of 300 LBW babies (cases) and 600 NBW babies, for selection of the controls maternal age and parity were matched. When two or more suitable matched controls were available for a case, two controls were selected randomly. Low birth weight continues to be a significant public health problem globally and is associated with a range of both short- and long term consequences.
Inclusion Criteria: All pregnant women who have delivered term singleton low birth weight baby were considered for study, irrespective of mode of delivery. Those mother willing to participate and gave consent for the study.
Exclusion Criteria: Preterm deliveries, Pregnant women delivering still born babies, multiple babies, Pregnant women delivering babies with birth defects, Pregnant women suffering from chronic illness and any illness during pregnancy and at the time of delivery.
Results Distribution of study subjects according to age group Table 1: Age group Cases (N=300) Controls (N=600) Total (N=900) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) <19 37 (12.3) 25 (4.2) 62 (6.9) 19-24 148 (49.3) 300 (50.0) 448 (49.8) 25-29 86 (28.7) 197 (32.8) 283 (31.4) 30-35 24 (8.0) 75 (12.5) 99 (11.0) >35 5 (1.7) 3 (0.5) 8 (0.9) Total 300 (100) 600 (100) 900 (100)
The distribution of study participants according to different age groups. The total number of study subjects were 900 among them 600 were controls of normal birth weight and 300 were cases of low birth weight. Majority of the study population 448 (49.8%) belong to age group of 19-24 years followed by 25-29 year age group.
In present study population >35 age group was the least about 8 (0.9%) of total study subjects. Among cases majority 148 (49.3%) and among controls 300 (50.0%) belonged to belonged to age group of 19-24 years. Distribution of study subjects according to religion Table 2: Religion Cases (N=300) Controls (N=600) Total (N=900) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) Hindu 278 (92.7) 514 (85.7) 792 (88.0) Muslim 8 (2.7) 23 (3.8) 31 (3.4) Others 14 (4.7) 63 (10.5) 77 (8.6) Total 300 (100) 600 (100) 900 (100)
1795 The distribution of study participants according to religion. Majority among the cases and controls belonged to hindu religion. About 278 (92.7%) of cases and 514 (85.7%) controls were hindu by religion. Subjects belonging to muslim religion were 8 (2.7%) and 23 (3.8%) of cases and controls Religion Cases (N=300) Controls (N=600) Total (N=900) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) Hindu 278 (92.7) 514 (85.7) 792 (88.0) Muslim 8 (2.7) 23 (3.8) 31 (3.4) Others 14 (4.7) 63 (10.5) 77 (8.6) Total 300 (100) 600 (100) 900 (100) International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research e-ISSN: 0975-1556, p-ISSN: 2820-2643 Chaudhary et al. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 794 respectively. Other religion category included christian, jain which contributed to 14 (4.7%) and 63 (10.5%) of cases and controls respectively. Out of the total 900 study participants majority of the subjects were graduates 237 (26.3%) were graduates followed by high school215 school 215 ( 23.9% ) educated upto highschool, 187(20.8%) postgraduates, 166 (18.4%) primary/secondary postgraduates and 95(10.6%) illiterates respectively. [10] Among the cases of low birth weight, mothers who had high school education and graduation were almost equal in number i.e 77 (25.7%) and 75 (25.0%) respectively. In the control group majority about 160 (26.7 %) were graduates and only about 51 (8.5%) were illiterate. distribution of cases and controls according to maternal occupation. Majority of the mothers in the study subjects werehouse wife were housewife by occupation 275 (30.6 %). (30.6%). [11,12] A substantial number of study subjects i.e 252 (28.0%) and 246 (27.3%) were engaged in coolie and agricultural work respectively. About 93 (10.3%) were professional belonged to particular field of profession with a bachelor degree. Only 34 (3.8 %) were engaged in other service work. low birth weight and normal birth weight infants in relation to maternal characteristics. Majority of mothers i.e cases and controls were in 19-29 years age group. Out of the 900 study subjects about 280 (31.11%) were first time conceiving mothers. About 130 (39.0 %) of cases and 284 (47.3 %) of controls had height < 145cms. Around 14 (4.6 %) of cases and 63 (10.6 %) of controls had severe anaemia. Out of the 900 cases and controls >60 kgs postpartum body weight was found among 76 (8.4%) subjects. About 416 (46.2%) had postpartum bodyweight of < 40 kgs and 408 (45.3%) had 40-60 kgs. [13] A substantial number of cases and controls had habits of tobacco 73 (2.33%) and 181 (30.1 %) respectively. The difference in distribution of cases and controls in relation to maternal age, parity, height and postpartum maternal body weight was found to be statistically significant (P<0.05). A significant association was found between inter- pregnancy intervalof inter-pregnancy interval of <18 months and birth weight of baby (P<0.05).
Discussion This case control study was done to identify the maternal risk factors associated with the low-birthweight low birth weight babies. In present study, 300 low birth weight and 600 normal birth weight babies mothers were asked questions (sample size low birth weight: normal birth weight 1:2 ratio). This ratio).This study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital where many of the pregnant women are referred from the peripheral centers. [11] In this study birth weight of babies was significantly association with illiteracy, primary and secondary education status of mothers. Hence maternal education showed inverse relation to birth weight of baby. Mothers [14]Mothers with lower educational status were at more risk of delivering low birth weight babies compared to mothers with higher educational status. Low educational status of mother leads to low health consciousness, lower nutritional status and low antenatal attendance leading to the increased risk of LBW babies. Study was done between April 2007 to March 2008. The overall proportion of LBW found in it was 23.8% which is more than national prevalence. Finding of our study is also consistent with the findings of Tyagi et al 11 [11] (1985), Hirve and Ganatra 14 (1994), Malik et al 15 [15] (1997), and Deswal et al 17 [17] (1999). Deshmukh et al 16 [16] (1998), Idris et al 3 (2000), Joshi and Pai18 (2000) Dasgupta et al 19 (2004) found higher percentage (>30%) of low birth weight compared to present study. A study done by Dasgupta et al 19 (2004) for Kolkata kolkatta and Idris et al. al [3] (2000) carried out hospital-based hospital based studies in setting similar to present study and found significant association between low maternal education and LBW similar to present study. Role of maternal education on birth weight has been revealed even in other studies by Joshiand Joshi and Pai 18 (2000), Biswas et al (2008) and Gupta et al (2008). Amin et al 25 (1993), Malik et al 15 (1997), Deswal et al 17 [17] (1999) revealed no association between maternal education and birth weight of baby. Mollar et al 87 in his study have shown that maternal weight 24 hour postpartum was equal to pre-pregnancy weight of mothers. [12] The finding of maternal stature and maternal postpartum body weight as a significant risk factors for LBW is consistent with the studies done by Saigal and Srivastava 20 (1969), Ghosh et al 10 (1977), Fedric and Adelstein 29 (1978), Dougherty and Jones 30 (1982), Tyagi et al 11(1985), Arora et al 34 (1987), Mavalankar et al 35 (1994), Dhall and Bagga 27(1995), Deshmukh et al 16 (1998), Sharma et al 4 (1999), Ghate et al 36 (2000), Sachdev (2001), Chhabral et al (2004), Khatun and Rahman(2008, Rahman(2008), Sargoor et al (2009). Kamaldoss et al 23 (1992), Amin et al 25 (1993), Malik et al 15 (1997) Deswal et al 17 (1999) revealed no significant association between maternal height, maternal weight and low birth weight. [13,14] If it is assumed that this relationship is causative, substantial improvement in birth weight of babies can occur by enhancing coverage of antenatal care by early registration of pregnancy. Das et al 21 (1981), Makhija 33 (1988), Kogan et al 41(1994), al(1994), Gawande et al 26 994), Malik et al 15 (1997), Anand and Gang 28 (2000) found that the birth weight of babies seemed to be influenced significantly by the time of registration in ANC by the mother. While Kamaldoss 23 (1993) did not find any significant association. [15] Mothers of 22% cases and 9% controls had interpregnancy interval of less than 18months. Mothers of 30% controls and 20% cases 1796 had interpregnancy interval between 18-24 months. A highly significant association was found between interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months and birth weight of baby. [16] The findings of present study emphasizes the need for improving the quality and utilization of antenatal care, nutritional education to improve the predelivery body weight, spacing, avoidance of strenuous work during pregnancy, prevention and proper management of risk factor like anemia along with improving socioeconomic and educational status of mother. [19]
Conclusion Many factors like illiteracy and primary secondary education of mother, maternal occupation like coolie and agricultural workers, class III and IV socioeconomic status, maternal height < 145cms, maternal postpartum body weight <40 kgs, severe anaemicstatus, anaemic status, moderate activities of mother, time of registration above 20 weeks of gestational age and interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months were found to be significantly associated with low birth weight.